Lutheran Baptism
This is meant to be a basic overview of the conservative understanding of Baptism from a Lutheran perspective.
When studying the Lutheran understanding of baptism one must
keep in mind that Lutheranism did not have an early formalized doctrinal thesis
such as Calvin’s Institutes, and that
over time, several men besides Luther (Melancthon, Martin Chemnitz, John
Gerhard, etc.) helped shaped early Lutheran doctrine. Thus, current Lutheran
doctrine isn’t necessarily identical to that which is found in Luther’s voluminous
writings.
Also, keep in mind that Lutheranism, like the Reformed
denominations, has been affected by the enlightenment, post-modernism as well
as other liberalizing movements. The
largest Lutheran denomination is the ELCA – which is very liberal, ordaining
homosexuals and even including ‘herchurch’ within its ranks a pagan church offering
a weekly ‘goddess rosary’ as well as other bizarre teachings.
The LCMS is the next largest Lutheran denomination in the US, and is generally conservative, much like the PCA for Presbyterians, but they do have some liberal groups in their midst. Other denominations include WELS, ELS as well as others, who part company with LCMS over missional issues.
The LCMS is the next largest Lutheran denomination in the US, and is generally conservative, much like the PCA for Presbyterians, but they do have some liberal groups in their midst. Other denominations include WELS, ELS as well as others, who part company with LCMS over missional issues.
Many modern Lutheran churches diverge from historic Lutheran
doctrine, and their views vary widely. So in this lesson I’m sticking with what
has been historically believed.
Historic Lutheran sacramental theology has often said by the
Reformed to be a “middle way” between the Roman Catholic and Reformed views of
the sacraments. In all honesty, the
Lutheran view is closer to the Reformed view, although generally missing (even
rejecting) covenantal structure and attributing some superstitious views to the
sacrament, once peeled away, they’re very much orthodox with some reservations.
Francis Pieper (1852 – 1931)–
Lutheran scholar – in his book Christian
Dogmatics states
“The difference between the Lutheran Church and the Reformed in the doctrine of Baptism is fully and adequately defined by saying that the former believes God’s Word regarding Baptism, the latter not” (vol. 3, p. 269).
“The difference between the Lutheran Church and the Reformed in the doctrine of Baptism is fully and adequately defined by saying that the former believes God’s Word regarding Baptism, the latter not” (vol. 3, p. 269).
I recalled, however, that this kind of
statement in regard to the sacraments goes back to the sixteenth-century
debates between the Lutherans and the Reformed. In his debates with the
Lutheran Joachim Westphal, John Calvin was almost driven to distraction by
Westphal’s repeated claim that Jesus’ words “This is my body” allowed of no
interpretation. One either believed them or one disbelieved them. In the
historical context of the Lutheran-Reformed debates, then,
Pieper’s statement is not terribly unusual. – Keith Matheson
Lutherans therefore can be very dogmatic and brash about
their specific positions.
(Explain Lord’s Supper – in/with/under.)
1) Traditional
Lutheran doctrine is rooted in their confessional statements found in the Book of Concord or Concordia. It contains 10 creedal
documents including the three ecumenical creeds, the Augsburg Confession of 1530, the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, the Smalcald Articles of Martin Luther (an apologetic work against
Roman Catholicism), The Treatise on the
Power and Primacy of the Pope, the Small
Catechism, the Large Catechism, the
Epitome of the Formula of Concord, and the Solid
Declaration of the Formula of Concord.
Sacraments
2. Lutherans have three sacraments: Baptism, Lord’s Supper, and Absolution (repentance and forgiveness, usually done corporately during the service, much like we have. But some have visible confession/absolution.) They believe sacraments are “rites that have the command of God, and to which the promise of grace has been added.”
2. Lutherans have three sacraments: Baptism, Lord’s Supper, and Absolution (repentance and forgiveness, usually done corporately during the service, much like we have. But some have visible confession/absolution.) They believe sacraments are “rites that have the command of God, and to which the promise of grace has been added.”
3. The central theme
of the Lutheran understanding of the sacraments is that they are “the word made
visible”.
Philipp Melanchthon wrote, in the
Apology of the Augsburg Confession -
"Surely our hearts ought to be certain that when we are baptized, when we
eat the body of the Lord, and when we are absolved, God truly forgives us on
account of Christ. And God moves our hearts through the word and the rite at
the same time so that they believe and receive faith just as Paul says [Romans
10:17], 'So faith comes from what is heard.' For just as the Word enters
through the ear in order to strike the heart, so also the rite enters through
the eye in order to move the heart. The word and the rite have the same effect.
Augustine put it well when he said that the sacrament is a "visible
word" because the rite is received by the eyes and is, as it were, a
picture of the Word, signifying the same thing as the Word. Therefore both have
the same effect."
Thus baptism can have
the same effect as the preached word to an unregenerate sinner (specifically an
infant). Thus they hold to a sort of baptismal regeneration, but not as the
Roman Catholics do. Lutherans
specifically reject the ex opere operato view
of the sacraments, noting that it is the Spirit who, through the sacrament,
does the work.
Thus, the combination of the rite and God’s word (read as his
solemn promise or vow) is what Lutheran’s believe is what the Spirit uses in
the sacraments. Similar to the way we believe that God uses preaching to form
faith in a person by the Spirit.
Again the Apology states: Here we condemn the whole crowd of scholastic
doctors, who teach that the Sacraments confer grace ex opere operato, without a
good disposition on the part of the one using them, provided he do not place a
hindrance in the way. This is absolutely a Jewish opinion, to hold that we are
justified by a ceremony, without a good disposition of the heart, i.e., without
faith.
Reading Luther on the sacraments can be challenging because as one might expect, coming out of Roman Catholicism, one’s views change over time. Some of Luther’s works sound downright ‘baptist’ in their theology – elsewhere he states:
“A
person can believe although he is not baptized; for Baptism is no more than an
external sign to remind us of the divine promise… or where the Gospel is there
Baptism also is and everything a Christian needs, because damnation follows
upon no sin except unbelief alone. This is also the reason why the Lord says:
"He that believeth not shall be damned." He does not say: He that is
not baptized; but is silent about Baptism. For Baptism is useless without
faith. It is like a letter to which seals are attached but in which nothing has
been written. Therefore he who has the signs (which we call Sacraments) and not
faith has seals only, seals attached to a letter without any writing.”
Yet 4. as Lutheranism
began to encounter Anabaptist views it seemed to cling tighter to a sacramental
system.
Augsburg Confession IV : [Lutheran churches]- “Of Baptism they teach that it is necessary
to salvation, and that through Baptism is offered the grace of God, and that
children are to be baptized who, being offered to God through Baptism are
received into God's grace.”
Small Catechism: What is
Baptism? Baptism is not simple water
only, but it is the water comprehended in God's command and connected with
God's Word.
It works forgiveness of sins,
delivers from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who
believe this, as the words and promises of God declare.
It is not the water indeed that
does them, but the word of God which is in and with the water, and faith, which
trusts such word of God in the water. For without the word of God the water is
simple water and no baptism. But with the word of God it is a baptism, that is,
a gracious water of life and a washing of regeneration in the Holy Ghost.
Through baptism, they say, “God actually washes away our
sins.” What makes baptism different than a bath is that “water is combined with
God’s word… together make a Christian baptism.”
“Baptism is not just plain water, but it is the water
included in God’s command and combined with a God’s word”, the placement of
God’s promise and His name upon the person.
Since Infants are sinful baptism takes away sin and regenerates
– by the power of the Spirit.
The Small Catechism states:
What does such baptizing with water
signify?--
Answer.
Answer.
It signifies that the old Adam in
us should, by daily contrition and repentance, be drowned and die with all sins
and evil lusts, and, again, a new man daily come forth and arise; who shall
live before God in righteousness and purity forever.
So the Lutherans view baptism much like we view the
preaching of the word. God uses the work of the person to graciously regenerate
the individual and/or bring them to faith.
Luther did not tie the work of the Spirit necessarily to the moment of
administration, but rather the rite was a visible promise of the Gospel which
through the hearing of the Word might bring about regeneration by the Spirit
then, or later in life.
5. Lutheran baptismal
regeneration is rooted in the Spirit’s work rather than the water or the work
of a priest, and acknowledges a distinction between the act and the time the
Spirit makes it effectual.
Fides infantium - Lutherans hold the view that in baptism, God
can graciously grant the baptized infant faith through which they are saved.
They don’t believe it is necessary to explain this rationally and argue that
Calvinists improperly attempt to rationalize the Bible.
Thus 6.
Lutherans believe that in baptism an infant is regenerated by the Word preached
and the “word made visible” and that infants are given the gift of faith.
This differs from the Roman view as well as
the Pelagian Anabaptist (Church of Christ) view by neither allowing the water
itself to be the sole instrument, nor the work of the human being in being
baptized as that which regenerates.
Luther therefore recognizes that because of original sin, an
adult is no different than an infant in regard to their inability to believe.
Thus he viewed that just as God gave faith through the preaching and hearing of
the Word, God could (and did) produce faith in an infant just as easily,
through the application of the “Word made visible” and the preaching of the
Gospel.
Arguing from circumcision (though not necessarily picking up
the covenant nature thereof) as well as the examples of John the Baptist
leaping in Elizabeth’s womb, Luther expressed the idea that infants could be
granted the gift of faith, prior to being able to elucidate that belief.
If [inclusion in the kingdom,
justification] was brought about with the Jews in the Old Testament through the
medium of circumcision, why would God not do the same thing with the Gentiles
through the medium of the new covenant (novo pacto) of baptism? The command
pertains to all (praeceptum universale est):"Go therefore and make
disciples of all nations, baptising them ... "Hence whereas circumcision
was commanded only to the descendants of Abraham, baptism is commanded to all
the nations, with the promise of salvation if they believe."
The nature of this faith, what it consisted of, was
confessed to be a mystery. While many
modern Lutherans hold to this, and quote Luther positively in regards to this,
later Lutherans (Melanchthon, Chemnitz, Gerhard etc) held diverse views. Chemnitz, for example, taught that it was on
the basis of the parent’s faith (called fides
aliena) that an infant could be baptized and saved.
Chemnitz later wrote: "Through
the washing of water in the Word there is no doubt that Christ works and is
efficacious by His Spirit in the infants who are baptized, so that they may
receive the kingdom of God, even though we do not understand how this takes
place.”
Lutherans claim is that baptism is “God’s work”, not a work
of man. It’s God’s Word, God’s promise, God’s washing, etc.
"To be baptized in God’s name
is to be baptized not by men, but by God Himself. Therefore, although it is
performed by human hands, it is still truly God’s own work. From this fact
everyone may readily conclude that Baptism is a far higher work than any work
performed by a man or a saint. For what work can we do that is greater than
God’s work?" – Larger Catechism
Thus there’s no sense of Pelagianism (that
man’s efforts save) in the Lutheran view, rather 7. Lutherans believe that God
works through the sacrament to save graciously just as He uses the Word to
bring about faith.
Liturgy
The baptismal liturgy of Lutheran churches resembles the Roman rite in many ways. The Lutheran baptismal is usually 8-sided, representing the 8th day on which an infant was circumcised, pointing to the Lord’s Day being the 8th day, the new Sabbath.
The baptismal font is normally at the entrance to the
worship area, rather than the front, representing that the entry into the
church is through baptism.
Older Lutheran liturgy (occasionally used in some churches)
includes an exorcism where the pastor makes the sign of the cross on the infant
and says “Depart, evil spirit! Make way for the Holy Spirit.”
The
pastor stands at the font and the family brings the child forward
He
questions them regarding their responsibilities and they respond “With God’s
help, we do.”
The pastor address the
congregation, asking for their prayers for the child and family, then the profess
their faith through a recitation of the Apostle’s Creed.
The pastor prays:
“Holy God, mighty Lord, gracious
Father: We give you thanks, for in the beginning your Spirit moved over the
waters and you created heaven and earth. By the gift of water you nourish and
sustain us and all living things.
By the waters of the flood you
condemned the wicked and saved those whom you had chosen, Noah and his family.
You led Israel by the pillar of cloud and fire through the sea, out of slavery
into the freedom of the promised land. In the waters of the Jordan your Son was
baptized by John and anointed with the Spirit. By the baptism of his own death
and resurrection your beloved Son has set us free from the bondage to sin and
death, and has opened the way to the joy and freedom of everlasting life. He
made water a sign of the kingdom and of cleansing and rebirth. In obedience to
his command, we make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
Pour out your Holy Spirit, so that
those who are here baptized may be given new life. Wash away the sin of all
those who are cleansed by this water and bring them forth as inheritors of your
glorious kingdom.
To you be given praise and honor
and worship through your Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, in the unity of the Holy
Spirit, now and forever.”
Water
is poured over the child’s head three times (tripartite infusion)
Candle
is lit and given to the parents - “Let
your light shine before others…”
Child
is taken up through the center of the church.
The Lutheran churches have some individual leeway as to how
this goes exactly.
Acceptance
8. Reformed churches recognize Lutheran baptisms as valid and accept those baptized in Lutheran churches without requiring rebaptism.
8. Reformed churches recognize Lutheran baptisms as valid and accept those baptized in Lutheran churches without requiring rebaptism.
Final thoughts
Keep in mind that 9. though Lutheranism
has similar categories and preaches the same gospel as Reformed theology, they
do not agree with us completely. Lutherans are not Calvinists… but they’re
not Arminians or Roman Catholics either.
Their view of the sacraments doesn’t take into account the
covenantal nature of the signs and seals, thus they have some superstitious
views about the sacraments. In the supper, for example, they believe that the
body and blood of Christ are “in, with and under” the bread and wine, but have
no actual Biblical basis for arguing this way, apart from “well Jesus said
‘this IS my body’.” When pressed they
generally retreat to the idea that “it is a mystery” and warn that we shouldn’t
ponder into such things.
No comments:
Post a Comment