tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post116188235026145215..comments2023-05-11T06:38:10.143-07:00Comments on Radon Thoughts: Richard Dawkin's LunchLockheedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162584373258585312006-11-03T12:06:00.000-08:002006-11-03T12:06:00.000-08:00"If they will not hear Moses and the Prophets, nei..."If they will not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they believe if one should rise from the dead" (Luke 16:31).Lockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162583877171405192006-11-03T11:57:00.000-08:002006-11-03T11:57:00.000-08:00CD's response points to one of the evidences of Go...CD's response points to one of the evidences of God's existence, that being our own. There's a lot of baggage in what CD's one sentence states unpacking that could be the topic of an entire blog post... book... or series thereof which I am far from qualified to write. As I pointed out, however, in a previous blog post (<A HREF="http://radongas.blogspot.com/2005/09/no-silver-bullets.html" REL="Lockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162541228046030552006-11-03T00:07:00.000-08:002006-11-03T00:07:00.000-08:00At least Micha gave it a try. Calvin Dude only ser...At least Micha gave it a try. Calvin Dude only servers for giving a good chuckle. Thanks Micha.<BR/><BR/>I'll go with you on a single fact. Hope about once piece of evidence? Not necessary though, as i do not want to disrupt your blog. I just came across it and it amused me. You are a good writer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162528587003487922006-11-02T20:36:00.000-08:002006-11-02T20:36:00.000-08:00anonymous said:---Is that how you see it? One thin...anonymous said:<BR/>---<BR/>Is that how you see it? One thing though, the prior poster mentioned facts. Can you kindly give one, once is all I ask, that proves the a god exists? Many Thanks!<BR/>---<BR/><BR/>How about: we exist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162528378123496352006-11-02T20:32:00.000-08:002006-11-02T20:32:00.000-08:00The prior poster mentioned facts, however, neither...The prior poster <I>mentioned</I> facts, however, neither the poster nor Dawkins has a "single fact" that "proves" evolution any more than I can provide a "single fact" that proves that the God of the Bible exists, single facts do not make for watertight arguments regardless.<BR/><BR/>The point here is that Dawkins does not "deal in facts" but rather argues that "god wouldn't make the universe Lockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162521977102059642006-11-02T18:46:00.000-08:002006-11-02T18:46:00.000-08:00Is that how you see it? One thing though, the prio...Is that how you see it? One thing though, the prior poster mentioned facts. Can you kindly give one, once is all I ask, that proves the a god exists? Many Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162513248708348112006-11-02T16:20:00.000-08:002006-11-02T16:20:00.000-08:00As far as "facts" go... Dawkins has none. He simpl...As far as "facts" go... Dawkins has none. He simply repeats the 'fossil record' claim, as if Stephen J. Guild's admission that the fossil record not only disproves gradualism but in fact establishes a completely different pattern never occured. Dawkins is one of the last apologists for a religion which has moved on, namely, Darwinism.Lockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162513142300059802006-11-02T16:19:00.000-08:002006-11-02T16:19:00.000-08:00I heard that show, and in it he repeated the same ...I heard that show, and in it he repeated the same metaphysical argument... "when we look at the universe we see a universe that god <I>wouldn't have created."</I><BR/><BR/>I now realize Dawkins is a one trick pony... and not a particularly good one at that. The well-armed and educated theist could evicerate one dedicated to such a religion. Now... where to find a one of those?Lockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162486932368329712006-11-02T09:02:00.000-08:002006-11-02T09:02:00.000-08:00Here is a link to Richard Dawkins form yesterday's...Here is a link to Richard Dawkins form yesterday's Forum show. He is brilliant and insightful. Funny, but he deals in facts and it gets some people all riled up to be asked for facts. Take a listen and see what you think. He was not at his best for the show, but still plenty good.<BR/>-----------------<BR/>ecently on Forum<BR/>Wed, Nov 1, 2006 -- 10:00 AM <BR/>Richard Dawkins and "The God Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162484999408651672006-11-02T08:29:00.000-08:002006-11-02T08:29:00.000-08:00my badhttp://nagasakiquixote.livejournal.com/22305...my bad<BR/><BR/>http://nagasakiquixote.livejournal.com/22305.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6710587.post-1162484919036819532006-11-02T08:28:00.000-08:002006-11-02T08:28:00.000-08:00hmm. interesting :)freikorps73@yahoo.comno email a...hmm. interesting :)<BR/><BR/>freikorps73@yahoo.com<BR/><BR/>no email at work mate :(<BR/><BR/>take a look you might like this<BR/><BR/>http://www.livejournal.com/editjournal.bml?journal=nagasakiquixote&itemid=22305<BR/><BR/>(delete comment at leisure. Peace)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com